The knowledge shown is actually accumulated into the context off bigger search projects, which consisted of reveal sociodemographic and you may relationship investigations, along with other balances when you look at the extent off close relationship
According to full lifetime of the connection, the typical, in many years, into the some other statuses described was, respectively: dos.89 (SD = 2.27); cuatro.94 (SD = dos.97), one another communities different between 6 months and you will 11 years of matchmaking; seven.76 (SD = cuatro.01), ranging from two and you may 19 ages; and you may (SD = 4.82), between lower than a-year and you will 29 decades. 8%) and existed that have family unit members, if you’re men and women living with the lovers were mostly performing anyone (69.2%), where 53% got university otherwise postgraduate grade. Of your own specialized commitment professionals, 67% got school otherwise article-scholar level, where 89.8% was indeed operating, 2% resigned and you can 8.2% out of work. The functional condition toward partnered users is actually similar: 89.5% have been operating, 2.9% have been resigned and you will 6.3% was underemployed, and you can step 1.3% called various other a career reputation. Contained in this class, 62.5% of professionals had college or university or postgraduate values.
Private relationship are examined according to Portuguese variation (Dining table step 1) of the reduced kind of the latest Time and energy Scale (Stanley, 1986), which was translated with respect to the following translation and you may retroversion methods: after permission gotten from the writer, the original measure was translated of the two experts in industry, both these translations have been exposed to retroversion because of the a few gurus, that bilingual plus one experienced in using the latest English language; ultimately, each type try as compared to brand new level, choosing making use of the terminology and you can factors with deeper proximity in order to it. The Portuguese variation ergo contains new 14 brand spanking new activities and you can a similar respond to level and try named, shortly after deliberation from the group, the private Commitment Scale (‘Escala de Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). To the last phase of your translation procedure, the latest software try given to three members on purpose of guaranteeing new adequateness of one’s vocabulary in addition to unambiguous comprehension of the things, that happen to be discussed towards the players immediately after application of this new questionnaire. Because there was indeed zero statements saying otherwise, things stayed a comparable.
Through an inform of the completely new Davis (1996, cited in the Lind, 2008) size, that it software is intended to scale relationships top quality perception, with the expectation you to, according to the theoretical presumptions, one another scales will definitely associate
Relationship Quality, chosen to verify criteria validity, was measured with the Relationship Rating Form–Revised (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt. by Lind, 2008). The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p escort service Milwaukee < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.
