Manage details
Sociodemographic control variables were examined at the baseline: decades, analysis website, studies, a position updates, marital reputation, and monthly money. , 2014), i together with controlled for amount of lovers previously six days whenever carrying out analyses with the help of our inconsistent condom have fun with dependent varying.
Techniques
Every users provided told written say yes to be involved in for each and every part with the research study. Every analysis methods and protocols have been approved by the Organization Opinion Boards in the College out-of Illinois at Chi town, the fresh School off New york during the Chapel Hill, plus the Instituto Dominicano de Dermatologia y Cirugia de- la Piel Dr. Heriberto Bogaert during the Santo Domingo, DR.
Analyses
I establish detailed statistics for every of your own sociodemographic parameters, GRC/S level, and you will mainly based details. For every single of your own about three centered parameters, i presented bivariate logistic regression toward standardized GRC/S rating while the separate variable. We report unadjusted possibility percentages (OR) and you may 95% confidence periods for those bivariate analyses. Then, i conducted multivariate logistic regression for every oriented adjustable that have standardized GRC/S get in addition to complete number of controls. For those Women’s Choice dating review analyses, we statement adjusted chance ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence durations (CI). Every analyses reported lower than have been conducted during the SAS version nine.cuatro.
Performance
Group functions are shown into the Desk step 1 . Really males was basically underneath the age 31 (median: 26; range: 18-41) and you will a majority (69%) got about a high school training. Seventy-three percent of men had been employed (possibly official otherwise casual labor sector), 11% have been out of work, and sixteen% was basically children. Simply 8% gained more twenty-five,100 Dominican Pesos (DOP) in past times times, regarding the 625 You.S. bucks (USD). Nineteen % received lower than 1000 DOP (twenty five USD) plus the rest of the people (72%) won ranging from a lot of DOP and you may 25,000 DOP. 50 % of the new males stated being single but had somebody, 14% was married, and you will thirty five% have been unmarried without normal mate.
We counted about three sexual risk routines ( Desk step 1 ). Thirty-1 percent of men reported having 2 or more people contained in this going back thirty days. Of men one to said which have a low-regular partner into the early in the day 6 months (letter = 194), 43% claimed contradictory condom play with having low-steady couples in the past half a year. When boys reported on history time they’d sex, 21% said that these were drinking alcohol.
Just before standardizing, the new GRC/S measure had a hateful out-of 18.dos (range: 3–34) and you may a beneficial SD of five.eight ( Table dos ). Select Table 2 for everyone level things.
Whenever review the bivariate associations anywhere between for every intimate chance conclusion and you can men’s room GRC/S results, we discover matchmaking in the asked direction ( Dining table step three ). Especially, people who had a higher GRC/S rating had large likelihood of revealing for every single sexual decisions. Two of the intimate behaviors–that have a couple of partners in the past 30 days, and alcohol consumption for a change gender – was indeed somewhat of the having an elevated GRC/S. The bivariate dating between contradictory usage of condoms which have non-regular lovers and you will GRC/S was not tall.
After controlling getting sociodemographic features ( Dining table step three ), highest GRC/S was notably associated with enhanced odds of with one or two or much more lovers before thirty days (AOR: step one.33, 95% depend on period [CI]: step 1.0step one-step one.74), contradictory condom use with non-regular couples (AOR: 1.forty-five, 95% CI: step one.04-2.01), and you can having a drink at last sex (AOR: step one.56, 95% CI: step 1.13-dos.17).
Conversation
The study provided service into association anywhere between GRC/S and men’s sexual chance practices, along with level of sexual partners, inconsistent condom explore that have low-constant partners, and having a drink for once intercourse.
